Skeptic Project

a POLOTICAN WILL NEVER BE ABLE TO KEEP TRACK OF ALL THE LIES THEY TELL!!! So yes he is stupid and yes he slipped up, he really dropped a bollock lol! NOW WATCH THIS DRIVE!!

No no Casey, you want us to believe these guys literally created the worst most idiotic and retarded conspiracy ever... but that in order for it to work also required them to be absolute genius'.

Bush may be stupid so isn't it more likely that he is stupid and incompetent... rather than him being in with a group of people where for your conspiracy theory to be true ALL OF THEM are REQUIRED to be complete retards and total genius' at the same time?

72% of people? Well, that's definitely a majority. Sorry to break it to you casey, but you're just a sheep. BAAAH

Casey you believe everything you hear without question so long as they are saying what you already believe.

But THIS moon hoax video by yours truly has MORE of everything:

*MORE secret societies
*MORE conspiracies
*MORE fake eyewitnesses
*MORE painstakingly researched falsehoods
*and better (podsafe!) music ...

http://www.associatedcontent.com/video/656179/the_moon_hoax.html?cat=60

You are never going to agree with me even when you are on a train to a fema camp you all would still be in denial!! lol

Denial is a defense mechanism postulated by Sigmund Freud, in which a person is faced with a fact that is too uncomfortable to accept and rejects it instead, insisting that it is not true despite what may be overwhelming evidence the subject may use.

One thing no one can disagree with is bush and blair are both war criminals, well i just want to see if some one does!!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8GWgqtsUabc

That cuts out before its finished but you get the idea.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PuAg-tOsrWU&feature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fcfpms98GeQ&feature=related

Vince... WOW

The albert einstein quote at the end say's it all.

Someone here (if not all) will disagree or poke fun no doubt, unless the first post back is in general agreement.

Muertos i have started to read thu your links but its quite extentive. Beside which im looking at more resorces. Yes i do love youtube, no it doesnt upset me i dont think its deadly serious.... and i dont belive all ct vids i see! I also don't belive alot of the debunker stuff just because you try to sound clever and educated.... i type fast and dont check my spelling so what!! This is a bit of fun for me more than anything some of it does bother me but not that much... the guys at the top will do what they want as they always have and there is bot all we can do at the bottom anyway!!

Presenting an argument in video format is much more emotionally satisfying than presenting an argument in any other way. Yep as i said its good fun aint it!!

But you are totally and hoplessly off the mark using this to shoot my last post down anyway!! look at the links and point out anything within that your argument can invalidate or (and especially the content therin!!

What you're doing, Casey, is called "slamming" which is another evasive techniques used by conspiracy theorists (especially 9/11 Truthers). As soon as one thing is refuted, the CT will then vomit up more links (almost always YouTube videos) and demand that the debunkers refute every single point contained within them. If we don't, then the CT claims victory and says whatever YouTube link they put up "can't be debunked." Slamming doesn't work here.

Why is the Iraq WMD issue relevant to conspiracy theories, anyway? I thought your point was that 9/11 was an inside job. How'd we wander off topic onto Iraq?

And here is somthing thats not a youtube vid... its a blog. See i don't do it all the time!!

http://911debunkers.blogspot.com/2009/09/debunking-national-geographic-911.html</p>

And this is proper CTers not a newbie like me, and they make an ass out of the national geographic trying to debunk them lol!!

critics usually overvalue particular items and ignore others

Interesting header at the top of the page i thought.....

"slamming" interesting terms you people come up with... im not trying to be "evasive"! What is the point of talking about it anymore.... If i found complete and utter proof positive you would refute it .... if the goverment admitted it tomorrow you would debunk it somhow! So what would be the point! That is why i changed the subject not to "slam" as you put it, but to more or less ask your opinions of the links i posted. But don't respond if you dont want to i'm not bothered anyway... my isn't this fun!

"What is the point of talking about it anymore.... If i found complete and utter proof positive you would refute it"

Unfortunately for you, that will never happen.

Hey man casey that last one is easy to debunk! God had went out with mrs god the night before, down to the celestial tandoori.

That morning he woke up with a bad case of flatulence which in turn caused the noise and the seismic activity that was recorded!! Bloody hell mate you must be dead stupid if you didnt know that man!!!

Casey why do you show us Dr Griffin's stuff when he is someone so crazy that he still thinks there were no hijackers on the flight manifests?