Skeptic Project

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=2681698310485866108#

And if they buy this they will buy anything....... and guess what guys ......they did.!!!

Is there any conspiracy you dont believe in casey?

Do you accept evolution? Or do you believe the Intelligent Design Creationists?

They exist only in the minds of conspiracy theorists.

If you tell someone enough there is a wire in the picture and that they can see it too if they look hard enough they might start to see it. In one clip its clearly just a film artefact, in the first one where he says there a "glint" its just shining off his suit at a particular angle LOL. Since this guy makes films, as utterly shit as they seem to be, he should know better.

I believe that "something" is the moon's lack of gravity :P.

Aaron, reading your posts you seem prone to get hung up on little details a lot. I don't mean that as an insult or anything, but it's just something that I've noticed. I would suggest reading Muertos' blog post from May 6th.

>>"Here is what we know:

1. Jake bought the gun and the bullets.

2. Jake came into the bank and robbed it.

3. Jake shot the security guard.

4. The dye bomb must have exploded sometime between 2 and 4PM, staining the money and Jake’s hands.

5. Jake threw away the gun near the bus station.

6. Jake paid for the bus ticket with stolen money.

Here is what we do not know:

7. Where did Jake go between 2:00 and 4:00 PM?

8. What did Jake do with the canvas bag?

Because items 1 through 6 are established fact, this means that items 7 and 8, whatever the explanation for them, cannot alter the conclusion we draw from items 1 through 6, namely, that Jake robbed the bank and shot the guard. Therefore, items 7 and 8, although unknown, aren’t very consequential."

Apply this to the moon landing and whatever "wires" you think you see.

I wasn't trying to take credit! Just pointing him in the right direction.

aaronmhatch sil is trying to fit in dont worry about it lol! aaronmhatch by the way you have eyes and whats more you can think for your self, well done!!

What ever sil BAHHHH BAHH

GOD MAN THERE HAS GOT TO BE MORE TO IT ALL THAN WHAT CHARLES DARWIN HAS SAID!!! LET ME BELIVE IN THE ANUNNAKI

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fpN_KD7b0NQ

Why does there have to be more to it? Just like why does everything have to be a conspiracy, casey? Why do you disavow any 'mainstream' explanation, not on it's contents, but simply because it is 'mainstream'?

Usual conspiracy theorist bullshit. Never trust anything "they" say simply because "they" say it, and the definition of "they" changes depending on what's being said.

If the BBC did a story saying that Osama did 9/11, Casey would denounce it as disinformation.

However, if Casey is aware of the BBC report from 9/23/01 reporting that "the hijackers are still alive," he would invariably claim that this story from the same BBC is unimpeachable truth.

Usual conspiracy theorist bullshit. Never trust anything "they" say simply because "they" say it, and the definition of "they" changes depending on what's being said.

If the BBC did a story saying that Osama did 9/11, Casey would denounce it as disinformation.

However, if Casey is aware of the BBC report from 9/23/01 reporting that "the hijackers are still alive," he would invariably claim that this story from the same BBC is unimpeachable truth.

Was that some kind of joke?

Muertos funny you shold say that, last thursday on newsnight (bbc1) there was a story about several of the hijakers that are still and to this day still alive.

>>"Muertos funny you shold say that, last thursday on newsnight (bbc1) there was a story about several of the hijakers that are still and to this day still alive. "

So why is this true when everything else that doesn't agree with your worldview is "disinformation"?

SIL IM NOT IN THE USA!!! OUR MEDIA IS STILL QUITE CREDIBLE!!

So what was the experiment? From context, I have to assume it's the moon landing since you posted no other examples in your original post.

So the moon landing was the experiment and not the grand show? Or was it both? You are seriously hard to understand.